Feb 1st- Feb 6th
This entry is from my journal about two weeks ago. I am currently reading Samantha Power’s “ A Problem From Hell: America and Genocide.” I started with the elephants because honestly that was how far I read into the itinerary before I booked the trip. Obsession may be too strong a word, consistently focused and passionate sounds more accurate to describe my views on elephants. My mother, on the other hand, is obsessed.
Everything about the Elephant Nature Park is inspiring: from its back-story to its tour guides, to its promise. The woman who started it, Lek, is a powerhouse of innovation, and is an example of a community based individual with foreign support that has created tangible positive change within her respective community. What can be a major challenge for organizations working in foreign countries is resistance from the communities, which is why it is important to integrate community members into the structure or even lead the organizations. Even the western elephant trainer struggles with xenophobia among the mahouts. (A mahout is generally a man who takes cares of an assigned elephant for the rest of its life, and many times the two create a meaningful relationship. Despite how incredible the job sounds, it is considered very lowly work, as a mahout basically stalks an elephant for fifty years.) I definitely have personal experience with xenophobia whether it was upon my arrival in Jamaica or as a “gringa” in Central America. What most people fear whether its skin tone, eye size, hair color, or language is simply the different.
The idea of difference and foreign becomes a pivotal determinant in genocide. When a country is tragically undergoing civil war genocide, its borders become impenetrable, its people become unidentifiable, its history unknown, and its culture unrecognizable to the outside world. More people would condemn foreign acts of aggressiveness than internal acts of extreme violence. For example (and here I do not mean to be overly controversial) more Americans will identify and remember more strongly Pearl Harbor, because it was our sons and fathers that were killed by the Japanese. They won’t remember the Hutu massacre of Tutsis despite ten times more people dying. If a Hutu were to cut down a Tutsi and an American with a machete, they would both bleed the same color. But only one would spark the attention of “world’s greatest country”. Replace one Tutsi with 800,000 and the statement still stands.
The fear of difference is why a) its so easy to understand why genocide is capable of occurring within countries and b) why foreign nations are hesitant to involve themselves in other countries’ internal conflicts since they doubt they will understand or change anything. It’s weird to think that our cultural divides become so apparent in such grievous and consequential events, when there are McDonalds and Starbucks in every city globally. If Western culture has infiltrated and linked the globe to the extent that some people believe, and indeed to the extent that even here in rural Laos, hamburger and fries is proudly displayed on every restaurant’s menu then, if that were true, the Mahouts would happily accept the Montana trainer’s method of positive reinforcement. What makes the tradition of how they treat their “livestock” more worthy of preservation then people’s traditional dress or dish? How do we conduct target training with different cultures? Should we even try? Otherwise Elephants are left to be tortured into submission under the argument that its been practiced for thousands of years.
And then Lek comes along. She doesn't have much national support from Thailand. But I have met some among her staff who grew up in Thailand, with fathers who were mahouts and practiced the painful traditional “crush” upon their elephant’s, and knew something wasn't right. They followed Lek’s voice to the Elephant Nature Park. A voice that most importantly sounded familiar.
Change is difficult; foreigners trying to cause change seems virtually impossible, and yet I try to implement the Jamaica Library Project with students from Washington DC, which has produced tangible positive change. If you create a group of people with the same strong belief all other differences fall to the wayside. Lek has been able to do that successfully, and therefore when I leave the Elephant Nature Park, I walk away with something that the victims of genocide were killed for and that is faith.
This entry is from my journal about two weeks ago. I am currently reading Samantha Power’s “ A Problem From Hell: America and Genocide.” I started with the elephants because honestly that was how far I read into the itinerary before I booked the trip. Obsession may be too strong a word, consistently focused and passionate sounds more accurate to describe my views on elephants. My mother, on the other hand, is obsessed.
Everything about the Elephant Nature Park is inspiring: from its back-story to its tour guides, to its promise. The woman who started it, Lek, is a powerhouse of innovation, and is an example of a community based individual with foreign support that has created tangible positive change within her respective community. What can be a major challenge for organizations working in foreign countries is resistance from the communities, which is why it is important to integrate community members into the structure or even lead the organizations. Even the western elephant trainer struggles with xenophobia among the mahouts. (A mahout is generally a man who takes cares of an assigned elephant for the rest of its life, and many times the two create a meaningful relationship. Despite how incredible the job sounds, it is considered very lowly work, as a mahout basically stalks an elephant for fifty years.) I definitely have personal experience with xenophobia whether it was upon my arrival in Jamaica or as a “gringa” in Central America. What most people fear whether its skin tone, eye size, hair color, or language is simply the different.
The idea of difference and foreign becomes a pivotal determinant in genocide. When a country is tragically undergoing civil war genocide, its borders become impenetrable, its people become unidentifiable, its history unknown, and its culture unrecognizable to the outside world. More people would condemn foreign acts of aggressiveness than internal acts of extreme violence. For example (and here I do not mean to be overly controversial) more Americans will identify and remember more strongly Pearl Harbor, because it was our sons and fathers that were killed by the Japanese. They won’t remember the Hutu massacre of Tutsis despite ten times more people dying. If a Hutu were to cut down a Tutsi and an American with a machete, they would both bleed the same color. But only one would spark the attention of “world’s greatest country”. Replace one Tutsi with 800,000 and the statement still stands.
The fear of difference is why a) its so easy to understand why genocide is capable of occurring within countries and b) why foreign nations are hesitant to involve themselves in other countries’ internal conflicts since they doubt they will understand or change anything. It’s weird to think that our cultural divides become so apparent in such grievous and consequential events, when there are McDonalds and Starbucks in every city globally. If Western culture has infiltrated and linked the globe to the extent that some people believe, and indeed to the extent that even here in rural Laos, hamburger and fries is proudly displayed on every restaurant’s menu then, if that were true, the Mahouts would happily accept the Montana trainer’s method of positive reinforcement. What makes the tradition of how they treat their “livestock” more worthy of preservation then people’s traditional dress or dish? How do we conduct target training with different cultures? Should we even try? Otherwise Elephants are left to be tortured into submission under the argument that its been practiced for thousands of years.
And then Lek comes along. She doesn't have much national support from Thailand. But I have met some among her staff who grew up in Thailand, with fathers who were mahouts and practiced the painful traditional “crush” upon their elephant’s, and knew something wasn't right. They followed Lek’s voice to the Elephant Nature Park. A voice that most importantly sounded familiar.
Change is difficult; foreigners trying to cause change seems virtually impossible, and yet I try to implement the Jamaica Library Project with students from Washington DC, which has produced tangible positive change. If you create a group of people with the same strong belief all other differences fall to the wayside. Lek has been able to do that successfully, and therefore when I leave the Elephant Nature Park, I walk away with something that the victims of genocide were killed for and that is faith.